December 2015, otherwise she would be removed from the employment relationship at USPS. North Bend Terminal Co., 752 F.2d 256, 261 (6th Cir. 1985) („The burden of proof is on the party alleging a breach of a collective agreement pursuant to section 301 of the [LMRA]“.) (other quotes omitted). The Tribunal finds that the appellant failed to demonstrate the facts at issue necessary in her violation of the CBA`s claim against USPS, in order to terminate USPS` request for summary judgment. See Morro v. DGMB Casino LLC, 112 F. Supp.3d 260, 277 (D.N.J. 2015) (cited contrans, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 836 F.2d 163, 169 (3d Cir.
1987)) (another citation omitted) (reject that a provision in a CBA should not have effect, and noting that a „contract should be read in such a way that it is meaningful of all its terms), when read as a whole“; Utility Workers Union of America, Local 601 v. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co., 2009 WL 331421, at *8 (D.N.J. 2009) (citing Teamsters Indus. Employees Welfare Fund v. Rolls-Royce Motor Cars, Inc., 989 F.2d 132, 135 (3d Cir. 1993) and Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, 270 F.3d 135, 139 (3d Cir. 2001) („Since the CBA is an agreement between PSE&G and the Union), its importance should be interpreted in accordance with the principles of the Treaty.
When the terms of the contract are clear and clear, it is appropriate for the Tribunal to determine the legal meaning of the contract“.); Passaic County Bd. . . .